How can the Kenyan experience be duplicated elsewhere (especially in Africa) where there could be a patent lack of data about livestock losses due to draught?
What if shock losses are not explicit correlated with observed natural hazards that affect larger areas (like droughts as you mentionned), but with more local/specific hazards, such as frost rain?
How do you convince pastoralists (non-market oriented) to buy livestock inurance when the prices they expect to receive for their animals is not that very encouraging?
Biniam from Nyala Insurance: Currently the index insurance is focusing on draught only but there are sizable number of farmers exposed to risks like frost, excessive rainfall etc...what about working on indexing this risks.
CCAFS is trying to take a strategic approach to index insurance. Where are the big overlaps between knowledge gaps and CGIAR strengths? How can the CGIAR best collaborate with I4 and other major initiatives?
Eduardo Marinho (Joint Research Centre): What would happen with the positive externalities obseved in the IBLI scheme, if the same kind of product would insure crop yields?Wouldn't it push food prices up and generate negative externalities to the poorest
One of the major constraint for effective demand is the higher reinsurance cost associated with the reliablity of the index is their any strategy envisage to work with reinsurers make the index more acceptable with reasonable price for the poor
18:39Cgiarclimate: